The concept of 'learning to trade' as a finite educational period is misleading because trading is fundamentally a process of continuous work and optimization
2.Bloc 1 - Fundamental ConceptFacile· Supervised residency bridge
According to the debate, what structural element does medicine possess that trading lacks, making initial finite trading education inherently incomplete?
4.Bloc 2 - Academic TheoryMoyen· Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (Lo 2004)
Under the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (Lo 2004), what happens to the alpha of a trading strategy as the market ecology and microstructure shift over time?
The Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox (Grossman & Stiglitz 1980) breaks down and eliminates active trading under which hypothetical condition regarding information acquisition?
Which assumption of Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky 1979) explains why traders must continuously manage their behavior because they evaluate losses more severely than equivalent gains?
If rapid advancements in AI and algorithmic trading cause trader skill depreciation to exceed the rate of return, which theory's assumption of a finite educational investment period breaks down?
How does the ongoing evolution of market microstructure, such as the rise of zero-day options and SEC Rule 605, force continuous re-education under the Adaptive Markets framework?
9.Bloc 4 - Expert SynthesisExpert· Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox (Grossman & Stiglitz 1980) vs Adaptive Markets Hypothesis (Lo 2004)
While the Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox justifies continuous work through the non-zero cost of information acquisition, how does the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis explain the necessity of perpetual strategy innovation?
10.Bloc 4 - Expert SynthesisExpert· Human Capital Theory (Becker 1962) vs Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky 1979)
How do Human Capital Theory and Prospect Theory fundamentally differ regarding the nature of a trader's ongoing challenges after the initial acquisition of technical skills?