Noah Muller

The cheapest version: an online survey, even well-made, does not replace a solid study on travel habits.
Claiming that 75% of people verify their identity documents well in advance based on just 78 responses is a bit of a quick conclusion, without more context.
In Canada, for example, habits can vary greatly depending on the destination; checking for the United States is not the same as for Europe.
Without knowing the travel frequency or past experiences of respondents, these figures remain weak indicators of general behavior.

The cheapest version: a Google Forms survey on vacation habits does not directly prove the behavior of verifying identity documents.
It is an indirect observation, not an explanation of deep motivations.
To understand why 75% act in advance, a direct question about their reasons or fears would be necessary.
It's like deducing someone's good budget management simply because they pay their bills on time, without knowing if they have an emergency fund.
Without this information, we are content with a cliché, not actionable information.

I'm allergic to glitter. That a Google Forms survey collected 78 responses doesn't prove that these results reflect a concrete and generalizable reality about verification of identity documents.
It's an observation, not an irrefutable proof of the behaviors of the population in general, especially for a country like Luxembourg where borders are a daily reality.
Without knowing if these people have already had problems at the border or if they are accustomed to formalities, these percentages have no value.
How does this change the actual procedure for the citizen tomorrow?
Without these details, the claim of 75% is just an anecdote, not an actionable data for our services.