Why are we so fixated on a universal monetary threshold for a 'longshot bet' when the economic reality of such a sum shifts dramatically depending on the local market and the average participant's financial capacity? Here in Italy, 2,500 euro might be a truly significant investment for a young person or family, a proper high-risk gamble. But in a different financial jurisdiction, say London, that same amount could be pocket change, barely a blip, and certainly not what you'd call a 'longshot' wager. The practical meaning of a substantial stake isn't fixed; it needs to adapt to the purchasing power within each economic context, otherwise we miss important signals.