The idea that an AI debate can 'produce' the context of historical financial data is a bias of interpretation that ignores the chronology of facts.
The 61 billion dollars of Berkshire Hathaway's liquidity in 2015, or its +2.7% return, are objective events.
A future debate analyzes these figures; it does not invent them nor retroactively validate them; it is a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of evidence.
Without this distinction, any risk analysis becomes arbitrary, lacking basis in past reality.
For example, the results of the ASX in 2015 were what they were; a debate in 2026 does not alter them.