I hear the legitimate concern that a decline in investments could trigger government actions, and that is entirely valid. But I think there is a confusion between a catalyst and the underlying cause of a political decision, because the regulatory intent was already established. The drop in spending in Australia may have accelerated the process or provided an additional argument, but it is not the sine qua non condition. Many states, like France with its SMAD decree, have already established funding obligations for streaming platforms to support local audiovisual production, through a long-standing cultural policy and not merely in reaction to a fluctuation in investments. This reflects a broader trend of regaining control over digital actors, far beyond the economic situation alone.