The idea that the decline in audiovisual investments 'triggered' streaming quotas is such a gross simplification that it borders on inaccuracy. Such a complex regulation does not arise from a simple economic situation but from years of political debates and intense sectoral pressures. Governments, like Australia's, do not respond to a mere decline with structural measures without a well-established ideological and legislative basis, taking for example the European Union from earlier years with local content obligations targeting streaming platforms. Attributing such a decision to a single factor is to ignore the legislative logic and the pre-existing cultural agenda.