The assertion that the decline in audiovisual investments has 'triggered' streaming quotas is a foolish simplification of legislative mechanisms.
The government did not suddenly react to a single statistic, but rather implemented policies for cultural sovereignty long before.
Claiming that a simple financial fluctuation is the main trigger ignores the history of demand for local content.
In Europe, similar directives were established without waiting for a collapse in investments, proving that these quotas are strategic initiatives rather than immediate responses.
It is the political will to protect the local industry, and not the cyclical failure, that drives such regulations.