It is unwise to assume that a simple decrease in investments is the sine qua non cause of Australian quotas, obscuring the structural dynamics and the underlying political will.
Stating that the government would only act in response to an immediate decline dangerously simplifies a complex legislative process.
The regulation of platforms is a global debate, driven by cultural sovereignty and support for the local industry, as in France where obligations have been imposed well before any decrease in spending.
These quotas serve broader political objectives, regardless of market fluctuations.
For example, countries like Canada have also implemented local content laws without waiting for a drastic drop in investments, demonstrating a proactive approach.