The assertion that the decrease in investments triggers quotas is a premature conclusion, a fallacious deduction from the simple fact that the Australian government announced streaming quotas after a decline in investment.
These regulations are never passive responses but voluntarist decisions stemming from a comprehensive political strategy.
To claim otherwise is to misunderstand the proactive nature of states in protecting their cultural sovereignty and industries.
For example, the Australian federal law on investment in local content existed long before this decline in investment; the context merely provided a pretext.
The proof is that Australia, like many European states, has never waited for a crisis to legislate on local content.