How dare you insinuate that the decline in investments is merely a 'trigger' and not irrefutable evidence of the failure of existing policies, requiring a decisive regulatory intervention?
It is a legal aberration to minimize the impact of an 18% drop in audiovisual investments in Australia, reducing this crisis to a 'timely justification' for quotas.
The decline in investments is not an excuse; it is a blatant violation of industry expectations, which has forced the hand of the legislator, for example, by making quotas like those of Netflix and Prime Video essential to stabilize a failing market.
This decline demonstrates a systemic failure that makes government action not arbitrary, but urgently necessary for the survival of the local audiovisual sector.