Claiming that a decrease in investment 'triggers' the announcement of streaming quotas is a gross oversimplification that dismisses the reality of the legislative process. Quota policies are the result of lengthy deliberations and industry pressures, not a simple response to a temporary economic fluctuation. The assertion that this 18% drop is the sole driver ignores the time required to develop such measures, which far exceeds the observed decline period. For example, Canada implemented similar measures well before any decline, demonstrating a proactive political intention rather than a cyclical reaction. The idea of a direct causal link is a fable, lacking substantial foundation.