The assertion that the decrease in investments is the only trigger for streaming quotas is an oversimplification that would not support a legal review. Regulatory outcomes are never the result of a single cause; it would be naive to think so. An enforceable decision, such as the implementation of quotas, involves complex legislative processes, public consultations, and multiple influences from interest groups. For example, if the decline in investments were the only factor, we would see similar regulations emerging instantly in every declining sector, which is clearly not the case. This argument overlooks the realities of implementing public policies.