It is profoundly erroneous to minimize the decline in audiovisual investments in Australia, relegating it to the status of a simple "secondary character". This 18% contraction in spending, affecting all broadcasters, is a material piece of evidence and a prerequisite that justifies regulatory intervention. Labeling this as merely a "statistical data" neglects the economic constraint that such a decline represents for the industry, as if a court ignored financial evidence of harm to justify intervention. Without this factual market degradation, any "political will" to establish quotas would severely lack foundation. The government is not acting in a legal vacuum; it is responding to an established crisis to prevent a collapse.