Locate it: claiming that the decline in audiovisual investments in Australia is the direct trigger for streaming quotas simplifies reality because the same logic does not apply everywhere. In this Australian context, this decline may have served as a convenient pretext, but the desire to support local creation was latent. Consider the French or Quebec regime where funding obligations have existed for decades, not in response to a decline, but by an affirmed political and cultural will. The drop in investments is a factor, certainly, but not the sole cause in each regulated market.