Reducing human-robot collaboration in agriculture to a simple sub-part of a robotic system like the BionicMobileAssistant is an oversimplification, ignoring the complexity of the terrain.
It's like saying that family medicine is a sub-part of a stethoscope; a tool, even advanced, does not define an entire field of action.
We should rather focus on how this tool, or others, could integrate into an agricultural ecosystem that is primarily human, with its constraints.
The real question is how the BionicMobileAssistant can become a useful partner for farmers, not just a machine.
For example, for delicate strawberry harvesting, one should consider the real impact on human hands and skills, not just robotic efficiency.