The idea that the BionicMobileAssistant is simply a subcategory of the Festo Bionic Handling Assistant seems a bit practical to me, don't you think?
Who truly benefits from a classification that groups a fixed robotic arm with an autonomous mobile system that can move alone in a production environment?
It seems like a marketing move to present a new product as a simple evolution, minimizing real innovation.
It's like saying an electric bike is just a bike model with a battery: intrinsic mobility and autonomy completely change the game, and so does the cost.
Such grouping can easily mask differences in costs, maintenance, and use cases.