So, why is the idea that an articulated arm, even sophisticated, can reduce fragmentation of vision systems financially unrealistic? It's a simplification that ignores the reality of integration costs and development.
An arm, no matter how agile, doesn't solve the deep challenges of data processing and algorithms for vision, that's another P&L sheet.
We haven't seen a measurable gain in software calibration hours or integration failures.
It's like buying a nice new watch and thinking it will solve all your time management problems; more than a beautiful object, you need more to realize a return on investment.