The idea that a robotic arm "reduces fragmentation" in vision systems is a statement lacking quantifiable precision; it reads as a qualitative deduction rather than a conclusion based on data.
What is the percentage reduction in software complexity or deployment time that justifies this claim?
Without a baseline score and a post-integration score, it's hard to measure a real impact, for example in a warehouse where a robot must identify packages of various shapes with a success rate of 95%.
Mechanical flexibility is just one of 10 factors; the vision system must reach a specific recognition rate for successful integration.