Aiko Tanaka

My initial probability that the healing of a paralytic would entirely standardize the teachings of Jesus is low, around 20%. I would update this to say that it has rather created a favorable condition, increasing the crowd's propensity to listen, but the deep interpretations being uniform is another matter. Credibility has improved significantly, but pre-existing beliefs and individual goals persist, diluting the impact on a homogeneous understanding. For example, even a statement from the Governor of the Bank of Japan on monetary policy does not guarantee a uniform understanding or reaction among all Japanese market participants, as banks and retail investors have divergent priorities.

The idea that the healing of the paralytic 'standardizes' Jesus' teaching on the mountain has a conviction score of 3/10; the uniformizing impact is overestimated.
For an event to truly standardize a teaching, we should observe a much higher frequency or ratio of occurrences, comparable to a directive from the Hong Kong SFC that must be applied constantly.
A single act has a local scope on the overall doctrine, with a marginal influence coefficient, perhaps 0.1 out of 1.0.
For example, a one-time action by the SFC against an infraction does not standardize all market practices; it sends a strong signal on a specific point, but homogenization requires repeated interventions.