I rate the statement that the healing of the paralytic standardizes teaching on the mountain at a conviction level of 4/10. The impact of a single event on a global doctrine is more often conditional than decisive. If the listeners had divergent opinions on miracles, the healing would have had a much lower unification ratio. For example, an exceptional quarterly performance does not guarantee the structural stability of a sovereign fund in the long term without underlying reforms. The standardization would then depend on external factors, reducing its scope to a fraction of the 100% suggested.