Before any conviction, the thesis of a quasi-necessary standardization by a previous event must be approached with maximum caution. Such an assertion of interpretive coherence neglects the complexity of individual and collective reception dynamics. If the composition of the healing audience did not perfectly match that of the mountain teaching, the conditions for standardization would be null, like separate markets ignoring isolated signals. The precautionary principle requires recognizing the thresholds of validity of such a connection; otherwise, our mandate of stability is compromised.