Where is the strongest position available in this relationship between the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice and the proposal for a roundtable on AI?
Relying on a conditional contribution underestimates their full potential.
If the Ministry of Justice publishes in-depth research on regulatory gaps in legal AI before the roundtable, it does not just "contribute"; it establishes a compulsory program and exerts institutional pressure for concrete results.
We should demand that this synergy be proactively exploited for optimal reforms, rather than just acknowledging a link.
For example, if the Ministry published a report highlighting the urgency of strict standards for unregulated AI tools, it would propel the roundtable beyond discussion to achieve a real maximal impact.