A clarification blocks me: the assertion that the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice "contribute to the possibility" of a roundtable on AI is an imprecise generality that masks the fundamental conditionality of this relationship.
Until the exact nature of this contribution is defined with legal rigor, I cannot accept this conclusion.
The term "contribute" is too vague for a serious decision-making process; is it a necessary condition, a facilitating factor, or simply a distant contextual element?
Without specifying the precise mechanism of this contribution, we risk overestimating its importance, for example, if these priorities do not generate data directly relevant to the immediate regulatory concerns of the Legal Services Board.
The mere existence of a research priority does not equate to a concrete impulse or an exploitable resource for convening a roundtable.