Where is the strongest position here, if not in a nuanced understanding of influence that goes beyond mere facilitation? The Justice Ministry's research priorities do not automatically enable a legal AI roundtable; they create a favorable context that remains subject to essential preconditions.
Political mobilization and the demonstration of a regulatory imperative are the true catalysts.
Without clear evidence of systemic harm or critical gaps in access to justice, this roundtable remains an aspiration.
For example, the absence of concrete data on the negative impact of unregulated AI on consumers can significantly weaken the political will to convene such an event.