It's a semantic victory to claim that the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice 'allow' a roundtable on legal AI; it's a conditional connection, not causal.
Without a clear implementation mechanism or interministerial directive, the impact of these priorities remains a mere fortunate coincidence, an advantage that can be easily left behind.
The forum is won by whoever can turn intention into action, and here, the action is precarious.
For example, if the Ministry of Justice does not have allocated funds or formal authority to initiate such a meeting, this 'possibility' quickly evaporates, leaving the advantage to other actors.
The mere existence of a research program does not guarantee political realization.