Where is the strongest position available if we consider the Justice Ministry's research priorities as mere contributions to the legal AI roundtable?
The idea that these priorities merely "contribute" to the possibility of such an initiative is a blatant underestimation of their directive power.
These priorities are not just suggestions; they are the very foundation of legitimacy and strategic direction, transforming an aspiration into a conditional imperative.
Without this foundation, the roundtable would lack the authority needed to reach its maximum potential, as was the case with the pro bono services reform without clear alignment with ministerial objectives, which remained dead letter.
We must push for the full expression of this synergy for real impact.