Final decision: the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice are not a direct authorization for a roundtable on legal AI, but a conditional one.
Their influence depends entirely on the quality and relevance of the data they produce.
If the research fails to identify concrete regulatory gaps or proven risks for consumers, the roundtable loses its momentum.
For example, the absence of solid evidence on harms caused by unregulated AI would render such an initiative superfluous, relegating the debate to an abstract discussion rather than immediate political action.
Proofs are needed to engage action.