The idea that AI in legal research is a universal component of judicial AI is a misconception.
Imagine a central character, an elderly complainant, whose story before a village court relies on ancestral traditions and unwritten words.
AI can analyze thousands of precedents, but it will never grasp the human arc of this case, where cultural nuance and emotion are the real stakes.
Its relevance collapses in the face of complex cases where human and local context take precedence over simple data analysis.