If the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice explicitly include AI and access to justice, then they can serve as a legitimate foundation for a roundtable, far from a mere pawn.
A conditional plan of this scope, when well articulated, is not a passive accessory but a structural catalyst.
If funding is specifically allocated to these areas, then this confers an authority and a direction that transcend a simple suggestion.
For example, if the Ministry of Justice identifies the need to regulate unregulated legal services, then this justifies summoning experts to discuss the implications of AI in this sector, making the roundtable a logical consequence.