The single point of failure here is the lack of an explicit mandate.
Saying that the MoJ's priorities 'contribute' to the round table on legal AI is a dangerous euphemism, because nothing forces the Legal Services Board to concretely integrate them.
Without a formal obligation, this connection is conditional and fragile, entirely dependent on a non-guaranteed political will.
If the MoJ does not explicitly link its research agenda to the objectives of the round table, such as requiring discussions on AI to address unregulated services, this influence will fade.