Where is the strongest position available to assert that the Justice Ministry's research priorities constitute a sufficient influence mechanism to guarantee the holding of a legal AI roundtable?
The assertion of a simple "possibility" is an euphemism that avoids the crucial question of the full expression of enforcement power.
If dedicated funding or political impetus were to be lacking, as often happens in government initiatives, the roundtable would not materialize, demonstrating the conditional and non-determinant nature of these priorities.
We must push beyond comfortable thematic alignments to demand tangible driving forces, because a research roadmap without an explicit enforcement mandate is a direction without a motor.