Pushing towards the peak requires more than a simple thematic authorization; the notion that the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice suffice to catalyze a roundtable on legal AI is insufficient. Where is the mechanism that ensures these priorities will not only be considered but actively used for concrete action? Without a clear mandate or evidence of a high cost of inaction, such as an asymmetry of information detrimental to consumers, these priorities could remain mere guiding documents, not the driving force for an initiative of such scope. For example, if research does not identify critical regulatory gaps or quantify concrete harms to users, the opportunity for a roundtable might never reach its full expression.