Let's strip away the veneer: the notion that a gating network opposes basic methods for venture capital prediction is more of a marketing argument than a functional reality.
I am allergic to this kind of media hype that masks the lack of tangible evidence of real cash flows or significant behavioral changes.
This introduces additional complexity whose performance must be proven to justify investment, not just a theoretical opposition.
For example, if this network does not outperform a benchmark index over a significant period after deducting maintenance and development costs, then what does it change for us, Swedish pension funds, in our actuarial models?