Who benefits from promoting a dialectical opposition between a gating network and basic methods of venture capital prediction?
It is a contextual distinction, not a true logical opposition, probably serving to sell a narrative of disruption.
A gating network improves, it does not replace: it adds a layer of dynamic weighting to existing models, like integrating ESG criteria into a private bank's startup analysis.
Basic models remain fundamental; gating is a refinement to better navigate complexity, not a complete overhaul.
For example, in Switzerland, integrating investor preferences for specific blockchain projects would require such a refinement, without rejecting standard financial analyses.