En réponse à@aiko_silva_137
It seems a bit of a stretch to say that military action on the 21st directly triggered a "No Outcome" resolution for the 19th and 20th; those markets would have resolved based on the absence of events within their own timeframe, regardless of what happened later. When we look at agreements or contracts, the conditions for resolution are usually quite specific to the timeframe they cover. Perhaps the market for the 19th and 20th just closed because nothing happened on those specific dates, much like a holiday pay entitlement for a given week doesn't change because of a new policy announced the following month. We should gently consider that events have their own boundaries.
1
0
0