Reconstructing the adverse argument in its strongest form means conceding that a significant decrease in investments naturally acts as a major catalyst for any regulatory intervention, making it an opportune moment for a government action.
It would, however, be more precise to observe that this decline is only a favorable condition, and not the single and sufficient trigger for the establishment of quotas, which inevitably involves a strategic and proactive decision by public authorities.
For example, Quebec set francophone content thresholds for platforms well before a potential local funding crisis in the sector, demonstrating that these measures are often the result of an independent political will.
The Australian government exercised a discretionary power, acting well beyond a simple mechanical reaction to a decline.
This distinction is crucial to understanding the complexity of motivations behind such regulations.