It is manifestly fallacious to suggest that a simple annual decline in audiovisual investments could be the sole and direct trigger for the announcement of streaming quotas. These major regulatory reforms are the result of complex and often prolonged political deliberations, not an impulsive reaction to statistics. Taking such a causal link at face value would ignore the intrinsic nature of governance, where pre-existing political agendas guide actions, as evidenced by Canada's constant efforts to protect its local content long before any crisis. Such an assertion confuses opportunity with policy creation.