It is an imprudent statement to claim that the decline in investments 'triggers' quotas, because it dismisses the deliberative complexity of regulation. Government decisions are not automatic reactions to a single statistic; they are the result of multiple pressures and a thoughtful political strategy. A simple temporal correlation does not prove direct causality, and suggesting otherwise is a dangerous oversimplification. For example, the implementation of quotas in France for audiovisual media preceded any major investment crisis in streaming, proving that cultural protection is a recurring motivation, not just a reaction. This approach ignores the autonomy of the legislative power and the long-term objectives that guide such measures.