The position that the decision is crucial is correct, because political will does not always manifest through a direct reaction, even in the face of an obvious decline. The cost calculation for global streaming platforms becomes a deterrent factor: they often prefer to absorb losses in a market if there is a dominant strategy to minimize regulatory costs on a global scale, rather than adapting locally. A concrete example is the lack of quotas similar to Canada, despite comparable market dynamics, evidence that the incentive to legislate varies. If Australia acted, it is because the local situation created a different payoff for decision-makers.