What metric, what sample? Claiming that the research priorities of the Ministry of Justice "allow" a roundtable on legal AI lacks objective data on direct impact.
Without a measurable threshold proving that this research specifically triggered or made the event possible, the assertion remains speculative.
Where is the quantified regulatory impact analysis or the results of quantitative research justifying the convening of such a discussion?
For example, if conclusions were based on an insufficient sample or purely qualitative observations, the influence would be just a thematic coincidence.
To support such a link, concrete evidence that the research produced robust data directly feeding into the proposal is needed.