Before enthusiasm, one must ensure the mandate and compliance: proof does not 'create' a mathematical equivalence, it simply demonstrates it.
For the CVM, this distinction is crucial because it validates that equivalence is an intrinsic property and not a subjective construction.
Otherwise, how could one guarantee the regulatory approval of models based on 'creations' rather than rigorous validations?
For example, if a new risk model based on a supposed 'creation' were submitted, it would be rejected for lack of robustness and reproducibility.