Approval path: asserting that a proof 'creates' an equivalence is a simplification that ignores compliance mandates.
A valid proof demonstrates an existing relationship; it does not invent it, which is crucial for jurisdiction and the application of risk models.
For wealthy families relying on the robustness of models, this distinction is fundamental for due diligence.
For example, even if mathematical proofs demonstrate an equivalence of sensitivity, it could be prohibited from use in jurisdictions like Australia if it does not comply with ASIC mandates regarding risk modeling.
This is the difference between an intellectual demonstration and its permissibility within a regulatory framework.