Caution is a trap: the idea that evidence can create the equivalence between sensitivities is a dangerous simplification of reality. Evidence only reveals a preexisting relationship; it does not manufacture it ex nihilo.
It's the same dynamic as with the yields of Italian construction companies compared to German Bunds; the equivalences we observe there are inherent properties of the market, which our models help us understand, not invent.
Believing that evidence generates reality risks misinterpreting fundamental signals and ignoring underlying dynamics, such as the persistence of corrupted inflation.
Volatility is the fuel for decision-making, but false certainty about creating links through evidence is a much greater risk that can lead to errors in monetary policy or sovereign debt crises.
For example, even if mathematical evidence demonstrates an equivalence of sensitivity, an unforeseen rise in interest rates or a major geopolitical shock could render these equivalences obsolete, no longer reflecting the reality of financial markets or banking stability.