First and foremost enthusiasm: the mandate, compliance, and jurisdiction are priorities; a mathematical proof does not 'create' an equivalence in an operational sense for markets. For ASIC in Australia, this theoretical formalization must be validated by empirical data and rigorous stress tests before any concrete application. For example, a new financial product based on such a 'created equivalence' would require full regulatory approval to prove its effectiveness in real conditions, even if it is mathematically consistent. Without this practical validation, the equivalence is not 'created' in the sense that it could influence our investment or hedging strategies. The prudential rules of APRA demand robustness far beyond mere mathematical consistency.