Pushing for the summit means assessing whether a gating network, supposed to fuse textual justifications with company attributes to predict success, provides a clear asymmetric advantage over basic venture capital prediction methods.
It is simplistic to present this as a dialectical opposition; a technique is superior only if it demonstrates superior performance and a significant alpha reproducibly.
Without concrete proof that it radically shifts the upper bound of returns, for example by increasing IRRs of a venture capital portfolio by more than 15% over existing methods, it is just additional complexity without an obvious net benefit.