How can we consider a mathematical proof as a creation of reality rather than a condition for its understanding?
Let's clarify: establishing an equivalence between fixed-point sensitivities and KKT sensitivities is a demonstration, not an act of genesis.
This technical understanding is valid under specific assumptions, but it does not generate markets or behaviors.
For example, even with this proof, the dynamics of dollar financing in Asia or the decisions of the MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) remain distinct realities, influenced by external factors.
One must decide the primacy of real conditions over abstract theory.